Is there spit on face of federal trade commission?


Added: 14-05-2008
Author: Lance Winslow
Category: Voice Over IP 		← Back | ↓ Related | Home →


Thus, the FTC took a 2-year to design a plan to stop spam, and returned with the only explanation. Spam went from nuisance to major problem and even with President FTC CAN spam law is impotent to implement it. Filed their 60-some cases, but the spam that comes from all over the world and still get 200 people per day, though most commercial filters both kujikwamua percent. Doubt that the FTC was not that he did that, it was Free Enterprise.

Now there is nothing new Called spit (spam over IP telephony), which threatened to overwhelm VoIP Networks. The FTC is now where? Maybe in some back room and play with their own after the collapse of one of the generic drug Viagra from canada online pharmacy spams? Looks more like a spit in the face of the Federal Trade Commission.

So far from the FTC's failure to follow the industry and never really accomplish anything they start now we have Spam, Splogs, Spit, phishing and pharming? One can get 100 days of their VoIP systems spit and the system does not give meaning to the user causing interference in their phone service? Not much Spit list, it would take nine months of the FTC to explain just what the Spit, but they do not have to look far if you do not egg on their faces, why is s Spit. So, think about it.



Link to this article:


Related articles
Otherwise there is a difference between a telephone directory online?
Publish: 05-11-2004 | author: Shashank Srivastava
List of phone calls to the owner of the front door using a reverse cell phone Hospitals
Publish: 06-04-2004 | author: Alec McEachern
Cheap GPS option - give the gift of time to get there
Publish: 24-07-2011 | author: Jeremy Lakota
Save face with satellite tv
Publish: 15-05-2011 | author: John R. Harrison



← BACK | ↑ TOP